I'm a poet / essayist / memoirist/
journalist (in the sense of keeping a journal, not of working for a newspaper) and it occurred to me that a blog fits in with all that. If Montaigne, father of the essay, were alive today, he'd keep a blog. This is my self-portrait as frustrated artist who can't believe she's not famous yet. (And because it's part of my artistic endeavor, the whole damn thing is copyrighted. All rights reserved.)
November 2008
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
            1
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
9 10 11 12 13 14 15
16 17 18 19 20 21 22
23 24 25 26 27 28 29
30            

Categories

  • Arizona
  • Art
    • Dance
    • Literature
      • Austen
      • Nonfiction
      • Poetry
    • Movies and Television
      • Buffy
    • Music
    • Visual Art
  • Blog Stuff
  • Body Stuff
    • Health and Illness
  • Education
  • Environment
  • Food
    • Recipes, Chocolate
    • Recipes, Main Dish
    • Recipes, Sweet But Not Chocolate
    • Side Dishes and Appetizers
  • Gardening
  • Gender
    • Feminism
    • Queerness
  • History
  • Humor
  • Me
    • My Writing
      • Poems
    • Self-Portraits
  • Pets
  • Philosophical Musings
    • Ethics
    • Ontology
  • Politics, Business and Economics
  • Relationships
    • Friends
    • Romantic
    • Sick and Twisted
  • Religion
    • Mission stuff
    • Mormonism
  • Sex
  • Stuff You Wear (Clothing, Textiles, etc)
    • Knitting
    • Shoes
  • Travel
  • Utter Miscellany

Archives

  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005

Recent Entries

  • The Only Legal Way to Cancel Out Your Neighbors
  • It's Funny Because It Isn't True, But Could Be
  • In Case You Were Too Lazy
  • Stealing the Other Guy's Lines Because Your Own Lines Stink
  • What Makes Democracy Work
  • The Worst Thing I've Heard in a Really Long Time
  • The God Off
  • Why the F**k Is This Story About American Greed in the British Press?
  • The Neo-Con VP Battles
  • It's All Right There on His Facebook Page

Recent Comments

  • Holly on God Fought the Law, and the Law Won
  • Juti on God Fought the Law, and the Law Won
  • rebecca on God Fought the Law, and the Law Won
  • Holly on God Fought the Law, and the Law Won
  • C. L. Hanson on God Fought the Law, and the Law Won

Read These

Old Friends

  • Dangerous and True
  • Genius to Spare
  • Lost in Seattle
  • Queer Gnosis
  • Queerest of the Queer
  • Rio Grande Valley Girl
  • While You're on Your Knees

Writers

  • Austen Blog
  • Creek Running North
  • Egalitarian Bookworm
  • First-Person Narrator
  • Gifted Typist
  • Romancing the Tome
  • The Writer's Almanac

Feminists

  • A Little Red Hen
  • Beyond Feminism
  • Carnival of Feminists
  • Feministe
  • Gendergeek
  • I Blame the Patriarchy
  • I See Invisible People
  • I'm not a feminist, but....
  • Kittywampus
  • Mind the Gap!
  • Pandagon
  • Syllogismism
  • Woman of Color
  • Women's Autonomy and Sexual Soivereignty Movements

Academics

  • Attempts by Stephen Frug
  • Bardiac
  • Center of Gravitas
  • Dr. Virago
  • Ivory Tower Dive
  • La Lecturess
  • Margo, darling
  • New Kid on the Hallway
  • Rate Your Students
  • Reassigned Time

Artists

  • Christi Nielsen About to Get Skinny
  • Crafster.org
  • Joey Moon
  • Saviour Onassis Art
  • blondstrawberry

News and Information

  • Bitch (s)hitlist
  • Broadsheet
  • Inter Press Services
  • Women's e News

Mormon-related

  • Bigelow's Rameumptom
  • Exponent II
  • Fiddley Gomme
  • Gay Mormon Stories
  • Latter-day Main Street
  • Letters from a Broad
  • Lolatini
  • MoHoHawaii
  • Mormon Women Writers
  • Review Revolution
  • Sideon's Sanctuary
  • Sister Mary Lisa
  • Sunstone Blog
  • The Visitors' Center
  • Young Stranger

Not So Easily Classified

  • Chronicles of Tewkesbury
  • Passion of the Dale
  • Real Adult Sex

Knitting

  • Knit Picks
  • Knit and Tonic
  • Knitty
  • Orchard Ranch
  • Punk Knits
  • Steal This Sweater
  • Wendy Knits
  • Yarnstorm

Powered by MT Blogroll

News Feeds


RSS1 | RSS2 | Atom

Credits

Powered by
Movable Type 3.35

Designed by

« The Corporate World Discovers the Benefits of Being Gay Friendly | Home | Sponge + Starfish = Scallop? »

August 21, 2008

God Fought the Law, and the Law Won

I’ve been thinking, ever since I wrote a response to that dreadfully illogical, dishonest, hypocritical document published by the church to explain its opposition to gay marriage, about struggles framed as a battle between the forces of god and the forces of who or whatever.

The thing is, god so often loses.

Several apt examples drawn from Mormon history:

1. God could not keep his people safe in Ohio, Missouri or Illinois. Mormons were persecuted, raped and murdered--and God couldn’t or didn’t stop it.

2. God could not make Utah sufficiently self-reliant that the church could exist without the trade and support of the US federal government, resulting in a showdown between the US government and the church over polygamy.

3. God could not influence the hearts and minds of the rest of the country enough that people would allow Utah to become a US state unless the church renounced polygamy.

Or look at Jewish history. God couldn’t or didn’t do much about the destruction of the temple, the diaspora, or the holocaust.

Or look at Catholic history. If it was the one true church, God should have been able to do something to stop Martin Luther and John Calvin. He should have been able to prevent the accession of truly immoral popes like the various Medicis and Borgias.

Mormons believe that god is omnipotent, but I’d like to see some serious evidence of that. When you look at what god actually manages to do, how good he is at furthering his agenda, the claim of omnipotence seems like the pathetic blustering braggadocio of a schoolyard bully. Seriously: according to Mormon scripture, God’s work and glory is “to bring to pass the eternal life of man,” a state that requires people to become Mormon. But when you look at how long the Mormon church has been around, and how few people actually join the Mormon church, well, the numbers show that god is pretty damn lousy at achieving his work and his glory.

Truth be told, god is a big fucking prurient loser. The only way to argue otherwise is to look at history after it happens, and decide AFTER the fact that whatever happened was god’s will. The civil rights movement? Oh, despite the resistance to it among christians, that was actually god’s will. The defeat of Nazi Germany? Well, despite the fact that it took a really long time and almost didn’t happen, and despite the fact that the Nazis’ victims numbered in the MILLIONS, it was actually god’s will that that happen. God didn’t have particularly strong feelings about other genocides, however. Cambodia, for instance--he wasn’t too anxious one way or the other about that one. And he stayed pretty neutral in Vietnam, sorta like the Red Cross, except without the part where he actually dispensed aid and comfort. Even now he ignores Africa as much as all the G8 Nations--the suffering of that entire continent isn't something he will ask his followers to redress, 'cause it doesn't involve his major obsession: letting white guys police how other people approach sex and relationships. And the conflict in Palestine/Israel seems to have him stymied, too. Especially given all he did to create that particular problem, you’d think he’d work a little harder to solve it--at least, he’d work harder if he wasn’t A) so feeble and B) such an asshole.

God is going to lose the battle over gay marriage, which is as it should be: god should lose any battle where his edicts and decrees are in opposition to the full development of human potential for love, compassion, intelligence and wisdom. Recognizing gay relationships by allowing homosexuals to marry is a positive step in developing that potential.

Now, there are some people who will say that because I am in favor of gay marriage, I am a tool of Satan. But that’s like calling me a servant of Voldemort or an agent of the Cylon Empire. Satan is a metaphor for evil, not an actual person. DUH.

And in return, I say that people who are opposed to gay marriage are not tools of Satan--they are just tools.

Opposing gay marriage makes people stupid, embarrassingly so. It requires them to resort to illogic and fear in order to fight something that isn’t going to hurt them. Which isn’t to say that opponents of gay marriage won’t have to change when it's finally accepted across the globe: they will be forced to join those who have seen the light and admit that the earth is round, that the earth orbits the sun and not the other way around, that other races are not genetically inferior to whites, that slavery is not a divinely sanctioned institution, that kings do not rule by divine decree. And that will indeed be painful for those who resist, but in that good way that maturing spiritually, emotionally and intellectually always is.

Not only that, but opposing gay marriage and taking the Lord’s name in vain by saying that he opposes it too just helps to show what a pathetic loser the god these bigots worship really is. You think they’d learn the lesson of the face-off between Jehovah and Ba’al and find themselves a god who can actually get something done. But no. They’re content to worship the puny, inept idol they’ve created in their own image, confident that one day, he’ll show up and reward them for being as small-minded, bigoted and cruel as he is. Whereas they’ve got their reward all along: they are as much like their nasty loser god as its possible to be.

Posted by Holly at August 21, 2008 10:24 AM

Comments

Wow!!! You're better than Christopher Hitchens! ;)

p.s. that's a compliment, not sarcasm.

Posted by: C. L. Hanson at August 21, 2008 12:19 PM

Thanks, CL. I confess I would have taken your comment as a compliment even without the explanation, but it's nice to know for sure how to read it. :-)

Posted by: Holly at August 21, 2008 12:37 PM

So say we all!

Posted by: rebecca at August 21, 2008 1:13 PM

It's not God that's losing, but the people who are taking his (or her or its) name in vain (ala your friend's definition in your earlier blog post) who are losing. I think God is a hands-off observer, myself.

Posted by: Juti at August 22, 2008 2:41 PM

Hi Rebecca--glad you see the point of what I'm saying. Juti, ultimately I agree with you: whatever force animating the universe that sometimes goes by the name of "God" doesn't have the agenda people often assign it/him/her, and s/he/it doesn't win or lose, no matter what we do--we don't impinge on it in that way. But given that the people who take his/her/its name in vain do so in part by assigning her/it/him an agenda, I want to show how that made-up being fails to achieve the agenda people claim it/she/he has.

Posted by: Holly at August 22, 2008 2:57 PM

Post a comment




Remember Me?

(you may use HTML tags for style)


Please enter the security code you see here